collaborative: spriggs article vs. our articles

We all agreed that Spriggs made a convincing argument, and proved her point in evidentiary support.  Specifically, she showed how local farming strengthens local economies, and reduces financial and environmental costs of shipping foods (produce, dairy, etc…) around the world.

2.       She addressed the counter-argument by giving it credibility, but said it is important to buy food that grows naturally in the environment around you, as much as you can.  She also stated that small farms are more efficient, despite the common misconception that larger farms produce more food.

3.       We said that using pathos, Spriggs can effectively persuade the reader that there is a need for people to buy locally.  By pointing out that almost all glaciers will be gone in National Parks by 2050, and talking about the treatment of animals she is able to establish her argument’s credibility.  It gives the reader a sense of responsibility in the issue.

4.       The picture of the semi – trucks, give you a visual of the environmental issues she is talking about.  They allow the reader to see just how big they are, and likely how much gas they use.  They also break up the text and give a visual aid.